[Mimedefang] Mimedefang 2.3 beta 3 and Spam Assassin 2.0

Rice, Kevin krice at spss.com
Thu Jan 10 10:55:17 EST 2002

It looks like there's another snag. What version of Mail::Audit are you

Looks like there's another problem. Not sure what it'll take to fix this one
Jan 10 10:49:21 spamshield sendmail[11593]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
g0AGnGq1011593: from=<steelrat at sword.damocles.com>, size=4536, class=0,
nrcpts=1, msgid=<200201101648.g0AGmxg02505 at sword.damocles.com>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=ns1.spss.com []
Jan 10 10:49:22 spamshield mimedefang[11582]: [ID 946266 mail.debug] Perl
stderr: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/Audit.pm line 51, <IN> line 110.
Jan 10 10:49:22 spamshield sendmail[11593]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
g0AGnGq1011593: Milter add: header: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot
roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Jan 10 10:49:24 spamshield sendmail[11599]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
g0AGnGq1011593: to=<kevtest at corpshield.spss.com>, delay=00:00:03,
xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=125043, relay=hqemail2.spss.com.
[], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK)

-----Original Message-----
From: David F. Skoll [mailto:dfs at roaringpenguin.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:54 AM
To: 'mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com'
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] Mimedefang 2.3 beta 3 and Spam Assassin 2.0

> I beleive the problem may be differences in the
> constructor call in mimedefang and how its actually defined in Spam
> 2.0.

Ah, that explains it.  I've only tested MIMEDefang with SpamAssassin 1.5.
I don't believe 2.0 was marked as stable on the Web site.



MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com

More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list