Even sillier disclaimers (was Re: [Mimedefang] defang startup
ronw at bals.org
Sun Dec 11 21:10:35 EST 2005
Joseph Brennan wrote:
> Sadly, I've even seen mail from law firms advising me, in effect, that if
> they have broken attorney-client privilege by sending me mail, it is now
> somehow my problem.
This has become a risk management checkbox item ("Told client to add
confidentiality/privilege waiver to all email, etc.").
On the off chance it helps someone else stop this inanity in their
organization, I pass this along. I have (so far) stopped our firm from
implementing just such a recommendation. I suggested that we also
include a (stupid) disclaimer on all paper mail. Hey, paper mail can
contain confidential information and be mis-addressed, copied,
forwarded, etc. People assume faxes and emails need these, but paper
letters don't. No one has come up with a good reason to treat paper
differently, but no one wants to add disclaimers to all their letters,
so this recommendation may wither on the vine (as it should).
More information about the MIMEDefang