[Mimedefang] Current state of Mimedefang and Clamd
bill at maidment.vu
Thu Mar 15 18:54:54 EST 2007
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:50:49 -0500 (CDT), -ray wrote
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> > My personal experience is that post 0.88 clamav has been significantly
> > less reliable (crashes with -lthr on FreeBSD 5.x, crashes with
> > -lpthread on 6.x), however YMMV.
> Anyone have any experiences with post 0.88 clamav on Linux or Solaris?
> Most of the discussion of clamav instability on this list concerned
No major problems with 0.90.1 on FC5 and FC6 both 32bit and 64bit, with and without
experimental. Just minor configuration slip-ups on my part and a patch needed for
mimedefang-2.61 (see mimedefang wiki).
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd
More information about the MIMEDefang