[Mimedefang] Virus-scanning in calling sequence
Paul.Murphy at argentadiscovery.com
Mon Oct 13 05:23:04 EDT 2008
> But I'm not comfortable running the much less thorough clamd without
> running uvscan, too. Just how "good" is clamd/clamav compared to
> uvscan? Should I just leave things as they are? If not, then perhaps
> it may be worth considering the following in general:
We also run this combination, and my experience is that nothing gets past Clamav which is a virus on our systems. Several items were flagged as false positives by uvscan, and in several cases where Clamav reported the contents of a message as a virus but uvscan didn't, I kept the message and manually scanned it with each day's updates to uvscan, and found that it was 2-3 days on average before they caught up.
However, I still run both of them...
Argenta Discovery Ltd, 8-9 Spire Green Centre, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5TR
Registered in England No. 3671653
More information about the MIMEDefang